Court Opinion · Bad-Faith Authority

Chang v. United American Security, LLC

Court: District Court, District of ColumbiaFiled: 2026-06-09

Excerpt

**Chang v. United American Security, LLC** Court: District Court, District of Columbia Filed: 2026-06-09T00:00:00-07:00 URL: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10872731/chang-v-united-american-security-llc/ process,” Shepherd v. Am. Broad. Cos., Inc., 62 F.3d 1469, 1472 (D.C. Cir. 1995). For the same reasons that payment of attorneys’ fees is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1927, given the “clear and convincing evidence” that defense counsel acted in “ bad faith ” when filing its disqualification motion and in its actions thereafter, see Parsi, 778 F.3d at 131, the same sanctions against Jakubowski, Calandra, and Barnes & Thornburg would also be appropriate under the Court’s inherent au
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this opinion apply to your claim?

If you're being lowballed by the same carrier on a similar tactic, this opinion may be one of your strongest authorities. Run our 4-step recovery walkthrough to get the standard, statute, and a response letter you can send today.

Open the Recovery Walkthrough →

Related opinions