Melby v. Doering
Excerpt
**Melby v. Doering**
Cite: 2026 MT 119
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Filed: 2026-06-02T00:00:00-07:00
URL: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10869009/melby-v-doering/
contingencies. Under the Title Contingency, performance was conditioned on Melbys’ receipt and approval of the preliminary title commitment (“Commitment”) for Marshall Mountain. The Commitment enumerated specific exceptions to the offered title insurance policy , including three discrete easements: 3 (1) for a private road, (2) for a lawn sprinkler system, and (3) for an existing driveway. The Commitment did not disclose any licenses or easements for public
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →Does this opinion apply to your claim?
If you're being lowballed by the same carrier on a similar tactic, this opinion may be one of your strongest authorities. Run our 4-step recovery walkthrough to get the standard, statute, and a response letter you can send today.
Open the Recovery Walkthrough →